FRADECO — home

E-invoicing in France

The reform changes how an invoice travels, not just its format.

From 1 September 2026, an invoice between companies established in France can no longer be a PDF sent by e-mail. It must carry structured data and pass through an approved platform. Foreign companies with a French subsidiary, a fixed establishment (“établissement stable”) or taxable transactions in France are affected — but not all in the same way.

See the timetable

A PDF invoice is not an electronic invoice.

This is the sentence most misunderstandings hang on. An electronic invoice is a structured data set that a machine can read. A PDF attached to an e-mail is not one — it counts as a paper invoice.

The reference standard is the European norm EN 16931. France’s minimum core admits three formats: UBL, CII and Factur-X. Factur-X does contain a readable PDF, but what counts is the XML file embedded in it.

The reform does not stop at the format — it also changes the route: from 1 September 2026, an invoice between companies established in France must pass through an approved platform, and part of the data goes to the tax authorities at the same moment.

France is pursuing three aims: digitising invoicing, improving the quality of VAT data, and strengthening the fight against fraud — with partial pre-filling of VAT returns as the longer-term goal.

Who must do what, and from when

Phased introduction of electronic invoicing and “e-reporting” in France
FromReceivingIssuing and reporting
1 September 2026every company subject to the receiving obligationlarge and mid-sized companies
1 September 2027every company subject to the receiving obligationmicro, small and medium-sized companies

The receiving obligation comes first: it applies to everyone from 2026. A subsidiary that will only issue its own invoices electronically in 2027 is therefore up a year earlier — the deadline most often discovered too late.

Electronic invoicing or “e-reporting”?

Which obligation applies depends on the business partner and the nature of the transaction. The two routes run side by side and do not overlap.

  • Electronic invoicingIt covers supplies of goods and services between companies established in France and liable to French VAT, where the transaction falls under French VAT and French invoicing rules.
  • “E-reporting”It covers transactions for which no electronic invoice is issued in the French B2B circuit: sales to private individuals and other non-taxable persons, certain transactions with companies established abroad, and where applicable the corresponding payment data.
  • Outside the scopeCertain transactions that are VAT-exempt and also relieved of the invoicing requirement stay out — notably in healthcare, education, financial services and insurance.

“E-reporting” is not necessarily invoice by invoice: the data goes to the tax authorities through the approved platform, at the frequency applicable to the company.

Payment data

For certain services, actual receipt of payment must also be reported. That applies where VAT becomes chargeable on receipt and the company has not opted to account for VAT on invoice date, provided the transaction is not subject to the reverse charge.

The information to be reported includes the date and the amount received. Where the payment relates to an electronic invoice, this data is added through the “Encaissée” status and transmitted by the platform. The timetable follows that of “e-reporting”.

The approved platform

Issuing and receiving pass through an operator registered with the French tax authorities. The current official term is “plateforme agréée”; “plateforme de dématérialisation partenaire”, abbreviated “PDP”, was previously in common use.

  • The choice is freeSupplier and customer need not use the same platform — approved platforms are interoperable. A company may also use several.
  • Connection takes timeEvery company subject to the receiving obligation must be able to receive from 1 September 2026. Choice and connection are therefore decided well before the deadline.
  • The software vendor has to keep upCheck with the vendor whether the invoicing solution or the ERP produces the required structured data and whether it is already connected to an approved platform.

The new mandatory particulars

The existing particulars remain. Four are added:

  • the customer’s SIREN number;
  • the nature of the transaction — supply of goods, supply of services, or both;
  • where applicable, the reference to the option to account for VAT on invoice date;
  • the full delivery address where it differs from the billing address.

The platform extracts the required data from the invoice and transmits it: in principle the issuer does not have to report the same invoice data a second time.

Rejection and refusal are two different things

The two words describe different events, and each calls for a different response.

  • A rejection comes from a platformThe issuer’s or the recipient’s platform does not accept the invoice for technical or formal reasons: an inadmissible format, missing or inconsistent mandatory data, a discrepancy between net, VAT and gross amounts, a routing or identification error.
  • A refusal comes from the recipientIt must be reasoned and has nothing to do with technology. As a definitive refusal it is intended above all for an invoice sent to the wrong recipient.
  • A substantive dispute is neitherWhere the invoice does not match the quotation, contract, order or service delivered, the intermediate processing or dispute statuses are used. The disagreement itself is settled outside the technical circuit, under the usual contractual procedures.

After a rejection, identify the cause, correct it and transmit again electronically. Whether the invoice number can be kept or a corrective invoice with a new number is required depends on the nature of the correction: a mere transmission incident, or a change to the invoice data. A copy sent through another channel remains informational and does not replace transmission through the platform. Errors, corrections and re-transmissions should be documented traceably.

What actually decides the outcome

The technical connection is only part of the project. Five points come up again and again.

  • Incomplete master dataWithout correct SIREN numbers, VAT numbers and addresses, some invoices can be neither processed nor routed.
  • Incompatible softwareInvoicing software, ERP or point-of-sale systems must produce the structured data and pass it to an approved platform.
  • Incorrect tax classificationCross-border transactions, reverse-charge cases, exempt transactions and sales to private individuals must be allocated correctly between electronic invoicing and “e-reporting”.
  • Effect on cash flowNon-compliant invoices lead to rejections and queries, and they delay payment. The subject is therefore operational and financial as much as technical.
  • Coordination within the groupWhere the ERP, a shared service centre or invoicing is centralised, the French requirements have to fit into the group’s processes.

Working together

The review in four steps.

  1. 1Establish the scopeWhich companies, establishments, VAT registrations and transactions are affected? This is also where the question of a fixed establishment for VAT is settled.
  2. 2Examine data and systemsAre SIREN numbers, VAT data, transaction categories, tax codes and invoice lines available and complete?
  3. 3Align platform and interfacesHow will the ERP, the accounts, invoicing and the approved platform be connected?
  4. 4Implement and testHow will invoice statuses, rejections, refusals, corrections, “e-reporting” and responsibilities be handled from now on?

Choosing the software and the platform is naturally yours. Where both touch the accounts and VAT, we supply what makes the decision easy: what the format has to produce, what the platform has to be able to do, and what needs to be ready before connection.

The deadline that counts first: the ability to receive, on 1 September 2026. It applies regardless of company size, and the lead times that matter are those of software vendors and platforms, not those of the tax authorities.

Frequently asked

What we are asked most often.

The answers below cover the situations that arise most often for foreign groups operating in France. An individual case always deserves to be looked at on its own terms.

Scope

When does mandatory electronic invoicing start in France?

From 1 September 2026, every company subject to the receiving obligation must be able to receive electronic invoices. Large and mid-sized companies must also issue them and transmit the required data from that date. For micro, small and medium-sized companies, the obligation to issue begins on 1 September 2027.

Is a French VAT registration enough to make electronic invoicing mandatory?

No. The obligation to issue requires establishment in France for VAT purposes — a subsidiary or a fixed establishment (“établissement stable”). A company that is merely registered may nevertheless fall under “e-reporting” for its transactions taxable in France.

Are foreign companies affected by the reform?

They can be, where they have a French company, a fixed establishment for VAT, or carry out certain transactions taxable in France. An invoice issued by the foreign company remains governed by its own law — but the French subsidiary receiving invoices from French suppliers falls within the receiving obligation.

Do small companies need to act as early as 2026?

Yes. Although micro, small and medium-sized companies only have to issue electronically from 1 September 2027, the receiving obligation applies from 1 September 2026. Choosing a solution and preparing the data therefore has to happen earlier.

What is the difference between electronic invoicing and “e-reporting”?

Electronic invoicing covers transactions between companies established in France and liable to French VAT. “E-reporting” covers transactions outside that circuit: sales to private individuals, certain cross-border transactions and, where applicable, payment data.

Platforms and formats

What is an approved platform?

An operator registered with the French tax authorities. It handles the issuing, transmission and receipt of electronic invoices, together with the extraction and transmission of invoice, transaction and payment data to the authorities.

The official term is “plateforme agréée”. Other names for it still turn up in older documentation.

Does every company have to choose a platform?

Every company subject to a receiving, issuing or reporting obligation needs an approved platform to meet it. That includes foreign companies not established in France that fall under “e-reporting” alone.

Can a company use more than one platform?

Yes. A company may use one or several approved platforms depending on how it is organised. Responsibilities, invoice flows, interfaces and the allocation of customers and suppliers to each platform then need to be defined clearly. Supplier and customer need not use the same one — approved platforms are interoperable.

Which invoice formats are supported?

The minimum core comprises UBL, CII and Factur-X. Factur-X is a hybrid format combining a readable PDF representation with an XML file holding the structured data. Depending on their services, approved platforms may accept and convert other formats.

Will a PDF sent by e-mail still be allowed?

No. An ordinary PDF or a scanned paper invoice is not a compliant electronic invoice. The invoice must carry structured data and pass through an approved platform. Factur-X remains possible, since it combines a readable PDF with XML data.

Will Chorus Pro continue to exist?

Yes. Chorus Pro remains the reference platform for electronic invoicing to the public sector. The reform of private-sector B2B does not remove the arrangement applying to public authorities and other public bodies.

In practice

What happens if an invoice is rejected?

An invoice rejected by a platform does not count as issued. Identify the cause, correct it and transmit again electronically. Whether the invoice number can be kept or a corrective invoice is needed depends on the nature of the correction. Without status tracking a receivable stays open unnoticed until it falls due.

What is the difference between a “rejection” and a “refusal”?

A rejection comes from a platform and concerns technology or form: an inadmissible format, missing data, inconsistent amounts, a routing error. A refusal comes from the recipient, must be reasoned, and is aimed above all at an invoice sent to the wrong recipient.

A substantive dispute is neither. Where the invoice does not match the contract or the service, intermediate processing and dispute statuses exist for that, and the matter is settled outside the technical circuit.

The next step

Know where you stand
before choosing a platform.

A first conversation establishes whether your presence in France falls under electronic invoicing or under “e-reporting” alone, and what follows from that for your systems. We work in French, German and English.

FRADECO SAS · Paris
50, Rue Chapon · 75003 Paris
+33 1 40 09 13 77
FRADECO GmbH · Bonn
Simrockstr. 92 · 53619 Rheinbreitbach
+49 2224 123 14 83